Spread the love
20 September 2013 Grievance Document Presented to Norway / UK Company executives
The 20 September 2013 Grievance Document is whistleblowing and so the 5 December 2013 SDK – PGS ASA Termination Settlement (governed by the laws of England) Contract Clause 5.5 is unenforceable per PIDA 43J

PGS ASA Uses Substantial Shareholder Value and Promotes Criminal Enablers to Suppress the Truth about their Wicked Corporate Corruption

John Francas <John.Francas@pgs.com>,
lars.mysen@pgs.com,
gottfred.langseth@pgs.com,
rune.olav.pedersen@pgs.com,
Carl Richards <carlrichards1@googlemail.com>,
NAulak@wfw.com,
Tippaya Moonmanee <tippaya@duensingkippen.com>,
olaf@duensingkippen.com,
berit.osnes@pgs.com,
gareth.jones@pgs.com,
ir@pgs.com,
kristin.omreng@pgs.com,
nathan.oliver@pgs.com,
rob.adams@pgs.com,
sarah.murphy@pgs.com

PGS ASA Executive Management

Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) and the Veneer of Governance (5 May 2016)

A Whistleblowers Response to PGS ASAs UK Head of Legal, John the “Fuckhead”, Blackmail

The Crimes of Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) CEO Jon Erik Reinhardsen (4 November 2016)
05 December 2013 PGSUK Termination Settlement Agreement
Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The referenced 20 September 2013 Grievance Document is protected public disclosure, as defined by the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA). According to PIDA Clause 43J, this prohibition is not enforceable. PGS ASAs 22 December 2014 and 16 July 2018 letters to SDK threatening legal action for such disclosure misrepresents protected public disclosure (whistleblowing). Therefore, the letters are both misrepresentations of material fact (fraud) and blackmail (extortion).
05 December 2013 PGSUK Termination Settlement Agreement
Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The PGS ASA directors have a fiduciary duty to shareholders / stakeholders to enforce terms and conditions contained within their contracts that protect the reputation and value of the company. PGS ASA Board of Directors have breached their duties through not taking action on public disclosures that disparage PGS ASA or any Group Company or Related Party.
05 December 2013 PGSUK Termination Settlement Agreement
Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The PGS ASA directors have a fiduciary duty to shareholders / stakeholders to enforce terms and conditions contained within their contracts that protect the reputation and value of the company. PGS ASA Board of Directors have breached their duties through not taking action on public disclosures that disparage PGS ASA or any Group Company or Related Party. SDKs submitted 20 September 2013 submitted grievance document is whistleblowing and the 5 December 2013 Termination Settlement Contract an illegal instrument used to retaliate against a whistleblower.
05 December 2013 PGSUK Termination Settlement Agreement
SDK has published legal and protected evidence indicating that he was illegally terminated from employment using a fraudulent termination settlement agreement supported by uttered defamatory forged documents that present a false justification for termination. This implies that all lawyers / firm involved in forming the termination settlement contract were co-conspirators in fraud and uttering forged documents to illegally terminate a foreign worker whistleblower. This then implies that PGS ASA misused resources to create forged documents and bribe the lawyers involved with the explicit purpose of harming physically, psychologically, professionally, and financially the whistleblower and his dependent family members whom PGS ASA also sponsored through endorsement with the UK Border Agency. PGS ASA owed SDK and his dependent family members a Duty of Care promised through their legal sponsorship of employment. PGS ASA human resources, and lawyers, along with lawyers from Watson Farley and Williams and Landau Zeffert and Weir (now Landau Law) uttering forged documents to illegally terminate a foreign worker whistleblower was a material misrepresentation to UK Border Agency (UK immigration) as well.
SDK has published content disparaging Watson Farley & Williams too. Why hasn’t Watson Farley & Williams who is contracted by PGS ASA to advise on UK employment matters staying quiet and allowing PGS ASA to not to invoke the non-disparagement clauses contained within two contracts between SDK and PGS ASA UK? The two contracts are governed by the laws of England and protect whistleblowers. SDK articles are whistleblowing against Watson Farley & Williams as well as PGS ASA.
Rights and protections for whistleblowers
If the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract between SDK and PGS ASA UK is whistleblowing, then the contract is retaliation. This is why PGS ASA and Watson Farley & Williams needed to manufacture defamatory forged documents showing termination for cause. SDK counsel Landau, Zeffert & Weir (now Landau Law) was a complicit double-agent who lied (gas – lighted) to their client and uttered forged documents to allow the illegal settlement contract to be proffered and signed. PGS ASA paid for this complicity – Bribed – Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Zeffert & Wier. PGS ASA is bribing Duensing – Kippen now. [Wake – up ActionFraud]
05 December 2013 PGSUK Termination Settlement Agreement
PGS ASA breached the terms and conditions of this agreement and defamed and defrauded SDK through not invoking the Confidentiality clauses of the original employment contract (PGS UK Personnel Handbook – 2013, Clause 2.9) and the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract (Clauses 9.) PGS ASA has not followed provisions and honored whistleblower protection laws (UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998). PGS ASA have misrepresented whistleblowing as defamation on LinkedIn and illegally deleted whistleblowing comments instead of investigating them. PGS ASA compliance also lied about carrying-out an investigation. Finally, PGS ASA litigation in Thailand was a breach of Clause 9.7.

PGS ASA violent and organized criminal acts are directed to harm and terrorize the dependents of a USA foreign worker whistleblower in order to silence truth and continue to defraud the oil and gas industry and rob shareholders. Breaching the Code of Conduct and Core Values to Preserve the Corrupt Power Structure is the Essential Ingredient to Career Progression within the PGS ASA “Business Unit” and Executive Tiers

PGS ASA Executive Management Retaliate Against Whistleblowers
FIRE THE PGS ASA BOARD OF DIRECTORS!

###