Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

PGS ASA and EAGE Amsterdam 2021

PINTEREST Q4 2021

SeismicRiskManagement.com

MarineSeismicSurvey.com Blog Listing

pgs asa corruption

pgs asa rico

pgs asa walter qvam

Landau Law – London, Employment Law

pgs asa sarah murphy

watson farley williams neeta aulak

holly hobson london BDBF

Q3 2021

pgs asa daphne bjerke

telenor silke hitschke

pgs asa erna solberg

pgs asa tina bru

pgs asa joshua may

pgs asa kristin omreng

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Landau Law Lies on TrustPilot

London Lawyer Philip Simon Landau, Director of Landau Law, will not even communicate with former client SDK before complaining to TrustPilot.

Would finding out that Landau Law will accept bribes and defraud a client influence a potential customers decision?

Landau Law should be able to address allegations of wrong-doing in a professional way. TrustPilot should not weigh in and remove honest, credible, albeit bad customer experiences.

rom:Steven Kalavity <>
to:Landau Law <pl@landaulaw.co.uk>,
Ryan Vullo <>
cc:barry.doherty@emlaw.co.uk,
berit.osnes@pgs.com,
ClareTaylor@bdbf.co.uk,
gareth.jones@pgs.com,
gottfred.langseth@pgs.com,
helen.monson@emlaw.co.uk,
imogen.finnegan@emlaw.co.uk,
ir@pgs.com,
joanna.mckenzie@emlaw.co.uk,
kristin.omreng@pgs.com,
lars.mysen@pgs.com,
nathan.oliver@pgs.com,
NAulak@wfw.com,
nickwilcox@bdbf.co.uk,
olaf@duensingkippen.com,
paulachan@bdbf.co.uk,
per.arild.reksnes@pgs.com,
PollyRodway@bdbf.co.uk,
rob.adams@pgs.com,
rune.olav.pedersen@pgs.com,
sarah.murphy@pgs.com,
sharon.playford@emlaw.co.uk,
terje.blojseth@pgs.com,
ActionFraud <contact@actionfraud.police.uk>,
Alan Zeffertt <alan.zeffertt@anthonygold.co.uk>,
Andrew Weir <andrew.weir@anthonygold.co.uk>,
Carl Richards <carlrichards1@googlemail.com>,
GDPR <gdpr@pgs.com>,
Holly Rushton <HollyHobson@bdbf.co.uk>,
ICO Case-Work <icocasework@ico.org.uk>,
Investor Relations – 01 Telenor <oystein.myrvold@telenor.com>,
Investor Relations – 02 Telenor <kristine.devold@telenor.com>,
Investor Relations Equinor <irpost@equinor.com>,
John Francas <john.francas@pgs.com>,
Landau Law <pl@landaulaw.co.uk>,
Law Society UK Complaints <complaints@lawsoc-ni.org>,
Minister of Transport Norway <postmottak@sd.dep.no>,
Norway – Police <kripos@politiet.no>,
PHSO-01 ICO <MP@ombudsman.org.uk>,
PHSO-02 ICO <publicaffairs@ombudsman.org.uk>,
Rhodri Thomas <rhodri.thomas@emlaw.co.uk>,
Tippaya Moonmanee <tippaya@duensingkippen.com>,
USA Consulate – Norway <OsloACS@state.gov>
date:Oct 18, 2021, 9:41 AM
subject:Landau Law Defamation of Steven Kalavity (SDK) through flagging / submitting false claim / report to TrustPilot
mailed-by:gmail.com

Landau Law

Companies House Company Number 08876494

Saint Clare House

30-33 Minories

London

EC3N 1DD

United Kingdom (UK)

RE:  Landau Law Defamation of Steven Kalavity (SDK) through flagging / submitting false claim / report to TrustPilot

        SDK Blog Listing

        2 October 2021 SDK Testimonial on Landau Law

        8 June 2019 SDK Testimonial on Landau Law

        NOPGS.COM Content October 2018

ATTN: Philip Simon Landau, Landau Law Director

Landau Law,

On 2 October 2021 Landau Law flagged a Trustpilot review written by SDK which related a truthful testimonial of a former client.  Landau Law stated that the testimonial contained illegal or harmful content.

TrustPilot:  Landau Law flagged this because it contains harmful or illegal content.

Landau Law does not specify what content published within the testimonial is harmful or illegal because there is no content within the published testimonial content which is untrue or illegal! Landau Law knows this.

Philip Simon Landau is an expert in UK employment law and drafting settlement contracts. Philip Simon Landau advised SDK on an employment termination settlement contract (the “Settlement”) processed under Watson Farley & Williams reference 49976848v5 which ended his employment with PGS Exploration (UK) Limited, 4 The Heights, Weybridge, England, KT13 0NY.

Landau Law is lying to TrustPilot and falsely accusing SDK of harmful and/or illegal behavior.  This is defamation.  It is also a breach in the Confidentiality terms and conditions of the Settlement: 

9.4 The Employee agrees neither to make nor publish, nor cause to be made or published, to anyone in any circumstances any statement (whether of fact, belief, or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Company [PGS Exploration (UK) Limited] or any Group Company or any Related Party.

9.6 Nothing in this Clause 9 shall prevent the Employee [SDK] from disclosing information which he is entitled to disclose under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, provided that the disclosure is made in accordance to the provisions of that Act and the Employee has complied with the Company’s policy from time to time regarding such disclosure.

9.7 In consideration for the obligations entered into by the Employee [SDK] in this Clause 9, the Company [PGS Exploration (UK) Limited] agrees to make reasonable efforts:

(a)    neither to make nor publish, no cause to be made or published, to anyone in any circumstances any statement (whether of fact, belief or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Employee (save as may be required by law or regulation), nor to represent the Employee as an authorized agent/employee or otherwise of the Company once his employment has ended; and

(b)    to keep the existence and terms of this Agreement [Settlement] and the circumstances giving rise to its making confidential and not to disclose, communicate or otherwise make public these terms to any third party save and except as required by law or regulation, or in confidence to its professional advisers.

Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998:

Workers are to be protected when the public disclosure consists of information where the worker reasonably believes that there has been a criminal offence, breach of a legal obligation, a miscarriage of justice, a danger to the health and safety of any individual, damage to the environment, or a deliberate attempt to conceal such acts.

43J Any provision in an agreement to which this section applies is void in so far as it purports to preclude the worker from making a protected disclosure.

The UK Limitation Act 1980:

The time limit for actions for defamation or malicious falsehood. The time limit under section 2 of this Act shall not apply to an action for (a)libel or slander, or (b)slander of title, slander of goods or other malicious falsehood, but no such action shall be brought after the expiration of one year from the date on which the cause of action occurred.

Landau Law is actively trying to deceive TrustPilot users.  Isn’t this exactly what TrustPilot should not allow?  TrustPilot testimonials should first and foremost be truthful and accurate.  If TrustPilot removes honest testimonials of a bad customer experience with a business, then there is no point to TrustPilot.  Perhaps TrustPilot users would shy away from businesses who accept bribes to defraud their clients. 

Landau Law had never even contacted SDK prior to complaining directly to TrustPilot.  This silence and lack of engagement is what infuriates SDK the most.  It is unprofessional, to say the least.  When voicing grievances, the system encourages parties to work it out between themselves before involving a third-party.  Landau Law has both the email used by SDK to register on TrustPilot as well as the email used when SDK actually was a client of Principal Philip Simon Landau.  Both are checked regularly.

Let’s start with the title and lead of the recent SDK Landau Law testimonial: Philip Landau is an accused criminal.  In fact, SDK has accused Philip Simon Landau of being a criminal within several online published blog articles.  The first article that actually named the accused in the article title, My Philip Landau and Watson, Farley & Williams (WFW) London Solicitors Testimonial was first published on website nopgs.com on 8 November 2016 and then updated/revised on 9 April 2017.  Watson Farley & Williams represented SDKs former employer, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited.  Thus, a clear breach of the Settlement that Philip Simon Landau advised on. 

SDKs central claim is that Philip Simon Landau and his assistant Holly Hobson (formally Holly Rushton), as paid legal advisors to SDK, accepted bribes and conspired to deceive client SDK into signing an illegal Settlement supported by uttered forged and defamatory personnel file records to defame (blacklist from work in the industry) and defraud client SDK.  These are crimes.  The article and allegations made within it are legally and contractually protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing.  The article and allegations are not a breach of any legal Settlement under the laws of England, where Philip Simon Landau and Holly Hobson are licensed to practice employment law.

PGS Exploration (UK) Limited, Watson Farley & Williams, and Philip Simon Landau and Holly Hobson never cited the article as a breach of the Settlement or defamatory within the one-year period that the UK Limitation Act 1980 allows since the Settlement is governed by the laws of England.

SDK published, The Crimes of @Philiplandau and #London #EmploymentLaw #Solicitor and Petroleum Geo-Services #PGS #CEO #Pedersen on nopgs.com 30 December 2017.  The links to the article along with image files were shared on the Twitter social media platform.  Landau did not complain directly but blocked his former client’s tweets.  Philip Simon Landau was clearly aware of the content of the linked publications which has never differed much from other articles.

In September 2018, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and (former) Company Secretary, Carl Richards, filed two claims against SDK citing Thailand law for criminal defamation.  There had never been a cited breach in the Settlement.  The claims reference only statements from My Philip Landau and Watson, Farley & Williams (WFW) London Solicitors Testimonial which was published over a year before that the Limitation Act 1980 dictates.  The publication of these claims is also a breach of Clause 9.7 in the Settlement.  SDK considered the Thai claims delivered by Thai law firm, Duensing – Kippen to be illegal blackmail / extortion to silence the truth. 

During the legal process of dealing with the PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and (former) Company Secretary, Carl Richards nopgs.com was stolen and evidence – posted blog articles and image, files – were destroyed.  The Settlement was never employed, but rather intentionally averted.

The entire point of a Settlement is to constrain parties from taking actions which are not prescribed by its terms and conditions.  PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and (former) Company Secretary, Carl Richards, Watson Farley & Williams, along with Philip Simon Landau and Holly Hobson have breached the Settlement.  SDK believes that this is because the Settlement is not a legal instrument, but rather an illegal device employed through criminal conspiracy to defraud, defame, and blacklist a whistleblower.

If SDK is wrong, the test is to use the avenues of redress prescribed within the Settlement and not complain to a third-party, such as TrustPilot. 

TrustPilot needs to demand that Landau Law employ the Settlement to de-publish unfavorable testimonials.  If TrustPilot does not do this, then they are propagating false and untrustworthy reviews.

Regards,

SDK

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Uncategorized Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Let’s Send PGS ASA Retired John Barnard to Prison

Backstabber & criminal John Barnard broke multiple international laws to aid and abet criminals in harming co-worker SDK and his family.

Liar and fraudster John Barnard agreed to accompany SDK through the grievance process. John Barnard accepted bribes and instead participated in the confidence fraud of a crime victim and foreign worker whistleblower.

Stupid cocksucker John Barnard also participated in defrauding multiple global government agencies, including data protection and immigration. John Barnard did not just defraud SDK, but every family member which was under the contractual duty of care of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited, 4 The Heights, Weybridge, England, KT13 0NY.

Barnard’s cowardly silence and violence against me and my family must be punished. Help me put this workplace harasser, fraudster, abuser and peice of shit in prison. If anyone had done this to YOU AND YOUR FAMILY you would demand justice too! Barnard is a pathetic peice of shit and his children, grandchildren, former co-workers, etc. should know this.

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Uncategorized Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Let’s Send PGS ASA Joshua May to Prison

Joshua May participated in the confidence fraud and other criminal acts with the intention to harm his co-worker and USA citizen SDK and his family. Joshua May was rewarded for assisting in these acts. Any parent who was a target of such crimes and abuse would agree that the perpetrator belongs in prison. Joshua May must also know that he belongs in prison.

Edward von Abendorff was the first-line supervisor for the PGS ASA Contract Sales – Africa group which was comprised of John Barnard, Joshua May, and SDK. Every employee of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed a copy of the PGS UK Office Personnel Handbook which outlined policy on bullying, harassment, and discrimination. The PGS UK Office Personnel Handbook also documented grievance and disciplinary procedures. All formed part of the contract of employment along with a pledge to uphold PGS Core Values and Code of Conduct.

From 18 June 2013 through 20 September 2013, PGS actively breached SDKs employment contract and obstructed his legal and contractual right to submit a workplace grievance. On 20 September 2013, SDK presented his grievance to PGS management. Co-worker John Barnard agreed to be SDKs witness throughout the grievance process and was provided a copy of the workplace grievance.

The grievance was legally protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing. Barnard was made aware that PGS had illegally proffered a termination settlement contract to stop the legal grievance process. SDK engaged London employment law solicitor Philip Landau to advise through the grievance process. Landau recommended that SDK not following the described grievance procedures and instead pursue an “enhanced” termination settlement contract. Under the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, such a settlement contract is illegal.

SDK needed to escape the toxic work environment and agreed to Landau’s recommendations. For the next few weeks, Landau “negotiated” the illegal termination settlement agreement terms and conditions. During this period, Joshua May was made aware that SDK had submitted a workplace grievance. Both John Barnard and Joshua May became complicit conspirators in the confidence fraud which financially robbed SDK, professionally defamed SDK, and most importantly placed the health of SDK and his family at risk.

John Barnard and Joshua May both were bribed to participate along with bribed solicitors/advisors to SDK, Philip Landau and Holly Hobson (previously Rushton). Landau led the confidence fraud game that defrauded his client and target/victim of discrimination and harassment. The cabal also defrauded data protection agencies as well as immigration agencies in the UK, USA, and Thailand.

PGS, Landau Law, and Watson Farley & Williams confidence fraud was discovered when SDK submitted a subject access request citing the UK Data Protection Act. SDK received the contents of his PGS professional personnel file and discovered that it was comprised of defamatory forgeries. A legally protected public disclosure was published 20 September 2015 showing the inaccurate and defamatory documents.

PGS, Landau Law and Watson Farley & Williams have continued to defraud and harass SDK through no explaining the many problems with the personnel file documents. All know they have participated in crimes against SDK.

Joshua May has never once proclaimed his innocence from accusations but relied on the criminal conspiracy of silence to protect him. Joshua May is a pathetic coward with no integrity who hurts people for no reason. Let’s put Joshua May where criminals like him belong!

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Uncategorized Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Trustpilot Review: Landau Law Uncensored

Trustpilot does not understand whistleblowing laws and flags/removes legally protected public disclosure which makes their reviews less trustworthy and protects corruption.

Trustpilot (26 September 2021): Landau Law flagged this because they believe it contains harmful or illegal content. Trustpilot is assessing the review in accordance with our flagging process, during which time the review will remain hidden.

Philip Landau is an accused criminal…

Philip Landau – Landau Law has defamed former client, Steven Kalavity (SDK)

Landau Law is lying and perverting the course of justice, which is a serious crime in of itself. Philip Landau was the principal employment lawyer who advised SDK on resolving a workplace grievance through a termination settlement agreement which contained confidentiality terms and conditions which prohibit the publication of “harmful and illegal” content and provides avenues for legal redress. The fact that Landau does not rely on his own contract should be known by the Truthpilot community.

Landau and his assistant at the time, Holly Rushton (now Holly Hobson practicing with BDBF), were principals in the confidence fraud of their client, SDK. Landau and Hobson provided illegal advice. A settlement contract should have never been considered since the grievance qualified as protected public disclosure or whistleblowing. Landau and Rushton also assisted in uttering forged documents – also crimes – to support the illegal termination settlement contract they advised on. This is why Landau Law complains to Trustpilot and does not rely on principal Landau’s advised on contract. The fraud would be easy to detect in a court of law.

PINTEREST Q4 2021

PINTEREST Q3 2021

SEISMICRISKMANAGEMENT.COM/BLOG/

SDK published accusations of Philip Landau and Holly Hobson crimes in 2016. SDKs employer, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and their advising counsel on the termination settlement contract, Watson Farley & Williams have never relied on the Landau-Hobson advised on contract’s terms and conditions to stop publications which began July 2015 on the LinkedIn Pulse platform. As co-conspirators in the fraud, Watson Farley & Williams also understand that the contract that they formed with SDK is illegal. Like the lies to Trustpilot, the conspirators lied to LinkedIn and got content depublished and SDK restricted from LinkedIn. PGS, Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law continue to misrepresent (fraud) the legality of their SDK termination settlement contract.

Landau and Hobson

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Stop Norway’s PGS ASA Lying and Cheating

PGS ASA and SDK are BOUND BY FOUR CONTRACTS WHICH CONTAIN TERMS and CONDITIONS PROHIBITING PUBLICATIONS that DISPARAGE PGS ASA or ANY OF ITS STAKEHOLDERS.

PINTEREST Q4 2021

PINTEREST Q3 2021

OTHER PINTEREST BOARDS

SEISMICRISKMANAGEMENT.COM/BLOG/

PGS ASA REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OBVIOUS: THEIR CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND DO NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION AGAINST LEGALLY PROTECTED PUBLIC DISCLOSURE [WHISTLEBLOWING].

PGS ASAs IRRESPONSIBLE AND CRIMINAL ACTS PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND IS THE REASON WHY SO MUCH CONTENT DISPARAGING PGS ASA POPULATES THE WEB, EVEN THOUGH PGS ASA EXPENDS TREMENDOUS RESOURCES TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR CORRUPT BUSINESS PRACTICES.

PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and Landau Law / LZW Law agents are allowed by upper management to remain silent and not address accusations of criminal and non-compliant behaviors? This is disgusting and obviously irresponsible.

Behind every PGS ASA perceived “legitimate” business endeavor or technology development is the fact that PGS ASA Directors and Management are corrupt pathological liars who intentionally deceive all stakeholders about company value and especially comittments to anti-corruption and health and safety.

The major stakeholders of PGS ASA, including customers, investors, and employees look the other way from the corruption. These top stakeholders benefit from the graft and greed that robs the average stakeholders. This is the very definition of corruption.

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Corrupt and Dangerous PGS has 3D Data in Angola

Corrupt and Dangerous PGS 2021 Offshore Licensing Round Data Covers Kwanza Shelf and Lower Congo Basin

Corrupt and Dangerous PGS data library coverage:

  • Blocks 7/21 and 8/21 on Kwanza Shelf from 3D dual sensor
  • Block 16/21 in the Lower Congo Basin from 3D dual sensor
  • Block 34/21 Lower Congo Basin covered by conventional 3D data
  • MegaSurvey | Regional coverage of 45 000 sq. km with information on thickness trends, structural setting, depositional environments, and play fairways (includes blocks 31/21, 32/21, 33/21)

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing Uncategorized Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Corrupt and Dangerous PGS Completes 2021 Canada Acquisition

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Uncategorized Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

Guillaume Cambois and the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG)

If the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) does not enforce a standard of conduct congruent to its published Code of Ethics, then the SEG simply becomes a club of the corrupt formed by lies and stolen money for their own self aggrandisement.

Guillaume Cambois was part of the Petroleum Geo-Services Executive Management Team and participated in the harassment, defrauding, discrimination, defamation, and blacklisting of an Active Member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG). These same claims were documented within the workplace grievance submitted to PGS September 20, 2013 which have been suppressed.

Guillaume Cambois remained silent as the upstream oil and gas professional community was lied to and deceived repeatedly. Cambois participated in corrupt PGS business practices which included defrauding the LinkedIn professional community, as well as government data protection and immigration agencies. Cambois also participated in the conspiracy breaking US Federal wire and mail fraud laws. SDK has evidence and this is why PGS uses social media censorship and search engine manipulation instead of the court system.

PGS has bribed its own personnel (this includes Cambois himself) through promotion and other gratuity to remain silent and allow this fraud and harassment of a whistleblower to continue.

PGS has also bribed legal firms Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Law / LZW Law to participate in the confidence fraud through forming illegal non-disclosure agreements to protect corrupt Board of Directors and Management and keep these claims out of the UK courts which governed SDK – PGS contracts.

The entire point of Non-disclosure agreements or contractual Confidentiality terms and conditions is to protect the value and reputation of a Company through prohibiting the publication by former employee’s of content that is disparaging. However, such prohibitions are not allowed for legally protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing.

It is obvious to anyone aware that there is a problem with the four (4) agreements between PGS-SDK. PGS breached the initial agreement and then illegally proffered a termination settlement contract to silence a victim of crimes and whistleblower. These first two (2) agreements are governed by the laws of England. PGS then blackmailed / extorted SDK using threats of criminal prosecution under Thai law where they possessed no legal jurisdiction. PGS misrepresented their legal authority to SDK multiple times.

Following PGS – SDK signing a termination settlement contract 5 December 2013, SDK returned to his US address in Houston, Texas. The termination settlement contract was signed following assurances that PGS would only process true and accurate personal data.

SDK began a job search upon his return to Houston. SDK also attended several Houston Geophysical Society events. During this time and different interviews, SDK sensed something was not right. However, SDK did not take action immediately because as a condition of the agreement, PGS would reimburse for household moving expenses from England to the US. The final reimbursements were paid in June 2014.

The termination settlement contract was not fully executed until all payments due were paid to SDK. In October 2014, SDK made a subject access request for all personal data that PGS processed for SDK. This included the PGS professional personnel file. Late 2014, SDK learned that PGS was processing false and defamatory personal data.

December 22, 2014, PGS threatened legal action against SDK if he did not cease making queries to PGS and the UK Information Commissioner’s Office who oversee Data Protection Act compliance.

On July 3, 2015, SDK published his first legally protected public disclosure on the LinkedIn Pulse platform. On August 24, 2016, SDK filed his first report to UK ActionFraud (police).

PGS Compliance Hotline, which included then PGS General Counsel Rune Olav Pedersen, would not respond to numerous queries. SDK began to publish comments on the PGS LinkedIn comment space. PGS would delete these comments and not process legally protected public disclosure according to policy and law.

PGS never took action on a breach of the contractual Confidentiality terms and conditions because the termination settlement contract was fraudulent / unenforceable. SDK was restricted by LinkedIn because PGS continued to breach their fiduciary duty and not take action on the contract.

Cambois was part of the PGS Executive Management Team through all of this defrauding of the upstream oil and gas industry. Cambois’ silence contributed to the violent abuse of SDK and his family members.

Cambois lacks the character and integrity to be a member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists, much less be on the SEG Board of Directors. If this publication is disparaging to Cambois or the SEG, then he is contractually obligated to take legal action.

The reason that Cambois does not is because such action would implicate him in a criminal conspiracy. But, that’s SDKs belief/opinion. (SDK has published the same claims since 2015.) Cambois needs to state his side of the story to all SEG members, as SDK has.

###

Categories
Bullying Business Ethics Geo-services harassment Human Resources marine seismic Marine Seismic Market Marine Seismic Operations mobbing UN Global Compact Whistleblower Workplace Bullying, Harassment & Mobbing

The Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) Laundromat

Not Enforcing the SEG Code of Ethics Encourages Corruption and Demeans the Profession by Allowing “Dirty” Business Practices to be Regarded as Ethical and “Clean” when SEG Dues are Paid through Graft and Greed.

The reputation and value of the SEG is diminished when there is no definitive action against Code of Ethics violators. If Confidentiality terms and conditions cannot protect PGS ASA reputation and value because they are embedded within fraudulent contracts, then they cannot protect the reputation and value of the SEG to its members.

Everything connected to the hierarchy of PGS ASA Board of Directors and Management is tainted with these corrupt business practices which go against published Core Values, the UN Global Compact, and of course the SEG Code of Ethics.

Not demanding that PGS ASA Board and Management end their silence and address allegations of corrupt business practices and criminal acts will damage the SEG its professionals.

Demanding that PGS ASA comply with the contracts that they proffer and endorse is not unreasonable and should not require ActionFraud (police) to awaken from their slumber.

Ben Kelly London DTN Counsel Accused Criminal

###