Tag: Head of Legal
from: | Steven Kalavity |
to: | [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Carl Richards <[email protected]>, GDPR <[email protected]>, John Francas <[email protected]>, Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]> |
date: | May 17, 2020, 8:47 PM |
subject: | Another Request for PGS ASA Sponsored Thailand Legal Claims against SDK |

Watson Farley & Williams advised PGS ASA on two contracts with SDK governed by the laws of England. SDK believes PGS ASA breached the first one and the second one was illegally proffered and supported by uttered forged documents. Now PGS ASA is retaliating against a USA foreign worker whistleblower using the laws of Thailand?
Another Request for PGS ASA Sponsored Thailand Legal Claims against SDK
PGS ASA / John Francas,
I continue to await delivery of the PGS ASA sponsored criminal and civil claims which were processed and delivered through Duensing – Kippen, a law firm practicing in the Kingdom of Thailand, which have caused so much trauma and damage to my reputation and the health and welfare of SDKs family.
As recently as 23 April 2020, PGS ASA sent an e-mail stating that SDK was in breach of the 11 November 2018 Compromise Agreement which was signed under threat of criminal and civil prosecution in Thailand. PGS ASA has claimed that an arrest warrant has been issued for SDK that impedes his safe travels in and out of the Kingdom of Thailand.
PGS ASA and the contract advisors, Watson Farley & Williams, refuse to clarify the status of the two contracts between SDK and PGS ASA UK subsidiary, PGS Exploration (UK) Limited. However, the processing of SDK personal data to forward claims in Thailand that are intended to harm SDK constitute a material breach by PGS ASA of the Confidentiality terms and conditions of the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract (the “Settlement Contract”), Clause 9.7.
Also, PGS ASA not acting on the Confidentiality Clauses relevant to the 2010 employment contract, as described in section 2.9 Confidentiality of the PGS UK Office Personnel Handbook (v. 01/2013) (the “Handbook”) constitute a material breach in fiduciary duty by directors and secretary of PGS Exploration (UK) Limited. Failure by directors and secretary to invoke the terms and conditions within section 2.9 in a timely manner caused significant damage to the reputation and value of PGS ASA.

PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors and secretary also were in breach of their fiduciary responsibilities in their not abiding by Handbook procedures in processing SDKs legal right to submit a grievance, w SDKs and his family health and safety at risks through not following policy, not abiding by policy in dealing with claims of harassment, bullying, and discrimination and ignoring employee stress due to a toxic workplace, thus abdicating their Duty of Care responsibilities to provide a safe and healthful work environment. PGS ASA also intentionally deceived UK Border Agency with regard to their legal sponsorship responsibilities of a Tier 2 visa holder and his dependent family members.
PGS ASA Compliance have also breached their responsibilities through not responding to numerous bona fide whistleblowing complaints since the signing of the unwarranted and illegally supported Settlement Contract. PGS ASA has breached their legal responsibilities by perverting the course of justice and mishandling such complaints. PGS ASA and their legal counsel denied SDK his rights under English law and contract. PGS ASA also denied SDK his legal right to see and correct personal data being processed in his name. In fact, on 4 December 2013, during “without prejudice” discussions, SDK stated as a condition for signing the Settlement Contract being assured that data was true and accurate. PGS ASA and Watson Farley & Williams misrepresented SDKs legal right under the UK Data Protection Act 1998 to correct personal data to see and correct his personal data. PGS ASA stated that it was their data and would not alter nor redact any of it.
Most of the publications that PGS ASA seeks to have unpublished relate to the personal data that PGS ASA processed to support the Settlement Contract. Following SDK submission of a subject access request citing the UK Data Protection Act, he learned of the deceit that transpired during the negotiations from 1 November 2013 – 4 December 2013. Again, SDK requested that PGS ASA correct his personal data. However, following several complaints, PGS ASA sent a letter addressing certain of SDKs concerns and stated that PGS ASA would alter SDK personal data through the inclusion of a 5 December 2014 e-mail sent to PGS ASA describing the several defamatory and false documents PGS ASA was processing as SDKs personal data. This PGS ASA alteration of SDK data to include the 5 December 2014 SDK e-mail is an acknowledgement that PGS ASA, Watson Farley & Williams, and even SDKs “legal” counsel, LZW Law, knowingly misrepresented the integrity of SDKs personal being processed to support the Settlement Contract. In other words, there was a conspiracy to defraud the victim of workplace discrimination and abuse to illegally terminate his employment under false pretenses uttering forged defamatory documents. PGS ASA Board of Directors and Compliance were completely vested in all of these violent and illegal actions against an employee who acted on his legal right by law and contract to submit a workplace grievance (20 September 2013 grievance referenced in the Settlement Contract, Clause 5.5).
PGS ASA breached the 2010 employment contract and then used a fraudulent Settlement Contract to escape accountability for their multiple breaches in fiduciary duty. Since the publication of the 2013 PGS ASA Responsibility Report and their joining the UN Global Compact, PGS ASA has engaged in a deceptive disinformation campaign to avoid invoking the Confidentiality terms and conditions and instead pervert the course of justice and continue their violent fraud and defamation of a whistleblower, again acting under his rights under by contract governed by the laws of England, but also the laws of Norway that should have guided all decisions and actions taken against SDK.
It is incumbent upon PGS ASA to address all published allegations and provide their side of the dispute for all stakeholders to evaluate under the laws of Norway and England first and then explain the criminal defamation claims filed in Thailand against a whistleblower. It is the duty of PGS ASA and PGS Exploration (UK) Limited directors and secretary. PGS ASA is beholden to carry out their fiduciary duty and behave ethically and in accordance to the laws, values, and code of conduct which forms PGS ASA promises and commitments to shareholders, customers, and employees.
Regards,
SDK

###
to: | John Francas <[email protected]>, [email protected], GDPR <[email protected]>, Carl Richards <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]> |
cc: | [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] |
date: | May 14, 2020, 2:18 PM |
subject: | Thaliand Claim Documents |
PGS ASA / John Francas,
I still await the legal claims and notices which were processed through PGS ASA and delivered by Duensing – Kippen.
Through e-mail, PGS ASA has essentially endorsed the delivery of the legal claims and notifications.
On 23 April 2020, PGS ASA / John Francas e-mailed that I was in “breach” of the 11 November 2018 compromise agreement that I signed in Thailand. For several weeks, apparently, documents were delivered to the home of my Thai relatives. However, I have asked several questions through e-mails from June 2018, and especially following the delivery of summons’ by e-mail in September 2018.
Why has PGS ASA refused to respond to these e-mails? Now that I am in the USA, PGS ASA refuses to deliver claims to me. What is PGS ASAs intention, really. How does PGS ASA see the issues within the claims being resolved if they are never delivered and presented to the “defendant”?
I want to resolve potential travel restrictions in or out of Thailand in the future. I need PGS ASA to responsible respond.
Regards,
SDK

to: | John Francas <[email protected]>, [email protected] |
cc: | GDPR <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], Carl Richards <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>, [email protected] |
date: | May 12, 2020, 6:06 PM |
subject: | PGS ASA Thailand Notices and Claims delivered by Duensing – Kippen |



Philip Landau, Landau, Zeffert & Weir (now Landau Law) was engaged by SDK to represent him on his grievance. Landau was complicit in uttering forged documents to support the fraudulent termination of a whistleblower. I have alleged that Landau and Watson Farley & Williams were bribed by PGS ASA.




05 December 2014 E-mail SDK to PGSUK – DPA SAR
###
PGS ASA Cannot Commit on which Illegal Contract to Tie Vexatious Litigation to!

John Francas <[email protected]> | |
cc: | [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Carl Richards <[email protected]>, [email protected], Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>, Steven Kalavity <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] |

Every time PGS ASA deleted SDKs LinkedIn comments, PGS ASA violated their social contract and defrauded shareholders and stakeholders. PGS ASA defecated on the principles of the UN Global Compact. Every deletion was breach of the original contract of employment and defamation of the whistleblower by the corrupt PGS ASA Board of Directors. PGS ASA Core Values, Code of Conduct, and Confidentiality terms and conditions form part of every employee’s contract. But, a corrupt PGS ASA Board of Directors rewards those who breach their contracts and help them maintain corrupt power and continue to deceive the oil and gas industry customers and investors.
PGS ASA UK and SDK 5 December 2013 Termination Settlement Agreement


Duensing – Kippen sent “Legal” Notice to SDK 15 May 2018. There were no further communications between Carl Richards or Duensing – Kippen until Criminal Defamation Claims were delivered September 2018




LINK TO LINKS to Legally Protected Public Disclosure about PGS ASA
###

The 20 September 2013 Grievance Document is whistleblowing and so the 5 December 2013 SDK – PGS ASA Termination Settlement (governed by the laws of England) Contract Clause 5.5 is unenforceable per PIDA 43J
PGS ASA Uses Substantial Shareholder Value and Promotes Criminal Enablers to Suppress the Truth about their Wicked Corporate Corruption

John Francas <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
Carl Richards <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
Tippaya Moonmanee <[email protected]>,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
PGS ASA Executive Management

A Whistleblowers Response to PGS ASAs UK Head of Legal, John the “Fuckhead”, Blackmail


Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The referenced 20 September 2013 Grievance Document is protected public disclosure, as defined by the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA). According to PIDA Clause 43J, this prohibition is not enforceable. PGS ASAs 22 December 2014 and 16 July 2018 letters to SDK threatening legal action for such disclosure misrepresents protected public disclosure (whistleblowing). Therefore, the letters are both misrepresentations of material fact (fraud) and blackmail (extortion).

Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The PGS ASA directors have a fiduciary duty to shareholders / stakeholders to enforce terms and conditions contained within their contracts that protect the reputation and value of the company. PGS ASA Board of Directors have breached their duties through not taking action on public disclosures that disparage PGS ASA or any Group Company or Related Party.

Excerpt from the SDK-PGS Exploration (UK) Limited signed 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract (the “Settlement Contract”). The PGS ASA directors have a fiduciary duty to shareholders / stakeholders to enforce terms and conditions contained within their contracts that protect the reputation and value of the company. PGS ASA Board of Directors have breached their duties through not taking action on public disclosures that disparage PGS ASA or any Group Company or Related Party. SDKs submitted 20 September 2013 submitted grievance document is whistleblowing and the 5 December 2013 Termination Settlement Contract an illegal instrument used to retaliate against a whistleblower.


SDK has published legal and protected evidence indicating that he was illegally terminated from employment using a fraudulent termination settlement agreement supported by uttered defamatory forged documents that present a false justification for termination. This implies that all lawyers / firm involved in forming the termination settlement contract were co-conspirators in fraud and uttering forged documents to illegally terminate a foreign worker whistleblower. This then implies that PGS ASA misused resources to create forged documents and bribe the lawyers involved with the explicit purpose of harming physically, psychologically, professionally, and financially the whistleblower and his dependent family members whom PGS ASA also sponsored through endorsement with the UK Border Agency. PGS ASA owed SDK and his dependent family members a Duty of Care promised through their legal sponsorship of employment. PGS ASA human resources, and lawyers, along with lawyers from Watson Farley and Williams and Landau Zeffert and Weir (now Landau Law) uttering forged documents to illegally terminate a foreign worker whistleblower was a material misrepresentation to UK Border Agency (UK immigration) as well.


If the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract between SDK and PGS ASA UK is whistleblowing, then the contract is retaliation. This is why PGS ASA and Watson Farley & Williams needed to manufacture defamatory forged documents showing termination for cause. SDK counsel Landau, Zeffert & Weir (now Landau Law) was a complicit double-agent who lied (gas – lighted) to their client and uttered forged documents to allow the illegal settlement contract to be proffered and signed. PGS ASA paid for this complicity – Bribed – Watson Farley & Williams and Landau Zeffert & Wier. PGS ASA is bribing Duensing – Kippen now. [Wake – up ActionFraud]

PGS ASA breached the terms and conditions of this agreement and defamed and defrauded SDK through not invoking the Confidentiality clauses of the original employment contract (PGS UK Personnel Handbook – 2013, Clause 2.9) and the 5 December 2013 termination settlement contract (Clauses 9.) PGS ASA has not followed provisions and honored whistleblower protection laws (UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998). PGS ASA have misrepresented whistleblowing as defamation on LinkedIn and illegally deleted whistleblowing comments instead of investigating them. PGS ASA compliance also lied about carrying-out an investigation. Finally, PGS ASA litigation in Thailand was a breach of Clause 9.7.
PGS ASA violent and organized criminal acts are directed to harm and terrorize the dependents of a USA foreign worker whistleblower in order to silence truth and continue to defraud the oil and gas industry and rob shareholders. Breaching the Code of Conduct and Core Values to Preserve the Corrupt Power Structure is the Essential Ingredient to Career Progression within the PGS ASA “Business Unit” and Executive Tiers
###







PGS ASA LAWYERS and HR PERSONNEL FRAUDULENTLY WITHHOLD INFORMATION

· Second Open Letter to PGS Exploration UK Limited Directors Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen, Carl Richards and UK Serious Fraud Office (15-Oct-2018)
· Open Letter to PGS Exploration UK Limited Directors Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, Christin Steen-Nilsen and UK Serious Fraud Office (9 Oct 2018)
· Letter to UK Companies House and Carl Richards, former PGS Exploration UK Limited Secretary (1-Oct-2018)
· Letter to Gareth Jones, PGS Exploration UK Ltd. and ICO Caseworkers (16-Sep-2018)
· Letter to Daphne Bjerke, Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (PGS) Data Protection Officer and ICO Caseworker (2-Sep-2018)
· Dear Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) Caseworker (1-Jul-2018)
· Open Letter to Board of Directors (18-Jun-2017)


###
PGS ASA Retaliated Against a Foreign Worker Whistleblower through Misrepresenting Legal Protected Disclosure as Criminal Defamation through Thailand Law Firm Duensing – Kippen

PGS ASA has a pattern of not responding to e-mails. This is why online publications have become necessary. Several e-mails were sent at the onset of the criminal accusations against SDK in Thailand. PGS ASA irresponsibly never answered. It must be emphasized that PGS ASA agents in Thailand, Duensing – Kippen, have no first hand knowledge of events written about and are not prosecuting based on evidence, but on a PGS ASA fraudulent narrative.


PGS ASA (PGS) delivered notice to former employee, Steven D. Kalavity (“SDK”) that he was in breach of a compromise agreement signed in Thailand 11 November 2018 (the “Thai Agreement”). For the past several months PGS has hired Thailand legal firm, Duensing – Kippen to deliver harassing legal notices to the residence where SDK stayed in Thailand while on visa. SDK is a USA citizen and never had the legal permission to remain in Thailand indefinitely. SDK informed PGS ASA that he was no longer living in Thailand 4 July 2019. Nevertheless, the harassing legal notices continued to be delivered to the physical address of traumatized Thai relatives even though the Thai Agreement only specified an e-mail address for communication. SDK has always rejected the validity of the totally unnecessary Thai Agreement. The Thai Agreement’s main purpose was to use Thai laws to gag protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing.

Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) and the Veneer of Governance (5 May 2016)
PGS and SDK had signed a termination settlement agreement 5 December 2013 (the “Settlement Agreement”) governed by the laws of England. The Settlement Agreement contains Confidentiality clauses that prohibit parties from publishing disparaging content about one another. However, there is a provision for protected public disclosure through included reference of the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA). The Thailand Agreement also prohibited SDK from disparaging PGS. However, the Thailand Agreement did not provide any exception for protected public disclosure, or whistleblowing. SDK has contended that the exclusion of such exception for protected public disclosure within the Thai Agreement made such “gagging” terms and conditions unenforceable. Nevertheless, Duensing – Kippen continued to deliver such notices in Thailand.

PGS’ UK subsidiary Head of Legal, John Francas, is now trying to enforce the terms and conditions of the Thai Agreement outside of Thailand through sending the Notice of breach of Compromise Agreement. SDK has never accepted the validity of the Thai Agreement, most notably because of the omission of terms and conditions regarding protected disclosure. SDKs employment contract was governed by the laws of England and allowed protected public disclosure under PIDA., the target of SDK whistleblowing was PGS ASA, a Norwegian corporation governed by the laws of Norway.
In Norway, whistleblowing is protected through the Working Environment Act 2005 (the “WEA”). Retaliation against an employee who makes use of this right and reports on censurable conditions in the organization is specifically prohibited by the WEA. Whistleblowing in Norway is defined as “reporting cases of blameworthy conditions that includes illegal, unethical, immoral, or illegitimate matters. PIDA (especially Clause 43J) and WEA have been the topic within most of the e-mail correspondence to Duensing – Kippen and PGS. This includes before, during and following the signing of the Thai Agreement.
Working Environment Act 2005
Section 2 A-2 Protection against retaliation in connection with notification
(1) Retaliation against an employee who notifies pursuant to section 2 A-1 is prohibited. As regards workers hired from temporary-work agencies, the prohibition shall apply to both employers and hirers. If the employee submits information that gives reason to believe that retaliation in breach of the first or second sentence has taken place, it shall be assumed that such retaliation has taken place unless the employer or hirer substantiates otherwise.
(2) The first paragraph applies correspondingly in connection with retaliation against an employee who makes known that the right to notify pursuant to section 2 A-1 will be invoked, for example by providing information.
(3) Anyone who has been subjected to retaliation in breach of the first or second paragraph may claim compensation without regard to the fault of the employer or hirer. The compensation shall be fixed at the amount the court deems reasonable in view of the circumstances of the parties and other facts of the case. Compensation for financial loss may be claimed pursuant to the normal rules.

PGS have intentionally misrepresented legal protected public disclosure, as defined by both PIDA and WEA as criminal defamation in Thailand. SDK being a whistleblower has been emphasized within e-mails and blog posts since long before the delivery of the Thai Claims. SDK was compelled to sign the Thai Agreement to avoid proceeding through two (2) criminal trials in Thailand. SDK never recanted that his published content was protected and further more never regarded the contents as untrue or defamatory, this includes up until and past 11 November 2018.
On 15 November 2018, out of desperation, SDK wrote a whistleblowing e-mail to JOGMEC (Japan Oil Gas and Metals Corporation) who had recently shortlisted PGS ASA to purchase a seismic vessel.
The email to JOGMEC stated:
Date: Thu, Nov 15, 2018
Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation
Thank you for contacting us.
The following inquiries were received.
Subject
Other
Your request or question
Business Ethics:
Please remove Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (PGS) from your consideration for the vessel sale and support contract
I am a whistleblower and have for over three years voiced my concerns about PGS board and management corruption and fraud.
I am a USA citizen who worked for the business unit in the UK. I now live in Thailand. Recently, PGS engaged in litigation in THAILAND against me to silence me. They have never addressed directly my claims of corruption, but instead engaged in threatening litigation to silence critics of health and safety and other practices. I had published numerous blog articles on nopgs.com. Nopgs.com is now offline due to this threatened litigation. One of my publications was an open letter to the PGS board of directors. Another publication called for the boycott of PGS. These publications began over three years ago. PGS refuses to address their internal corrupt business practices. PGS violates their own Core Values and the principles of the UN Global Compact. I have also written about this.
Country
Thailand
Name
Steven Kalavity
Company name
Marine Seismic Survey

Somehow, PGS agents were made aware of this new protected disclosure and stated that I had breached the terms and conditions of the recently signed Thailand Agreement. PGS, again ignoring the laws of Norway and England, threatened new criminal prosecution. SDK tried to recant the new whistleblowing claims of the earlier email to JOGMEC, but it was too late.
Date: Fri, Nov 16, 2018
Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation
Thank you for contacting us.
The following inquiries were received.
http://www.jogmec.go.jp/english/
Subject
Other
Your request or question
I sent an earlier mail. And I did not know you would disclose this communication to Petroleum Geo-Services.
However, I have agreed to a compromise agreement with Petroleum Geo-Services processed in Thailand that will come into affect 19 November 2018 and I should have not related any matters to you.
I have agreed to unpublish my posts and take down a website critical of PGS.
So, I apologize for announcing to you this information.
Under the terms of the pending agreement, I should not have contacted you. So, please disregard the previous communication. Matters have been settled.
Petroleum Geo-Services and I have agreed to stop.
Best regards,
Steven
Steven Kalavity
Country
Thailand
Name
Steven Kalavity
Company name
Marine Seismic Survey

PGS, through Duensing – Kippen, scheduled new criminal proceedings for 29 January 2019. In the interim, SDK would have to wait for a decision as for whether or not these proceedings would proceed or if PGS would accept the Thailand Agreement. SDK had taken nopgs.com offline (and listed the site for sale) as part of the terms and conditions of the Thai Agreement. However, from 1 – 10 December 2018, SDK was ordained a Thai monk at the behest of his Thai family to earn merit. While SDK was a monk and not accessing his websites and online content, nopgs.com was stolen and SDK lost access to the content. I mentioned this to my Thai lawyer, but remained remarkably unconcerned. PGS agreed to allow SDK to write an apology letter so that the criminal proceedings would not progress.
18 January 2019
To PGS Exploration (UK) Limited and Mr. Carl Richards,
Please accept my apology for the offensive content which I have published on-line over the years and for directing such content through e-mails, especially once a compromise agreement was me.
I am hopeful that we can put these matters behind us and that I can focus on my family.
Sincerely SDK

However, I believe this was illegal domain theft and the destruction of evidence, since the principal site that published the “disputed” content was nopgs.com. Nopgs.com remains pertinent for any continued litigation in either Thailand or the USA (e.g., Harris County, Texas). The Thai Agreement does not reference specific content nor even the specific claim document(s).

SDK was essentially held hostage in Thailand due to the litigation. My marriage visa expired in February 2019 and I would not be able to remain in Thailand indefinitely. PGS agreements cannot supersede governments rights to grant permission to enter Thailand. PGS has been overstepping their legal authority by both expecting and later demanding that their “legal notices” be received and acknowledged. PGS has never sent SDK the actual claims by e-mail, the manner designated within the Thai Agreement. Apparently, PGS sends claims in English from England to Duensing – Kippen in Thailand to be translated and delivered to relatives of SDK, since SDK is not a citizen of Thailand and no longer resides in Thailand. PGS is aware of this.
Historical Listing of Blog Articles
###

Notice of breach of 5 December 2013 Settlement Contract
to: | John Francas <[email protected]>, GDPR <[email protected]>, Carl Richards <[email protected]>, [email protected] |
cc: | [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] |
date: | Apr 27, 2020, 1:53 PM |


Under the terms of a Settlement Contract between PGS Exploration (UK) Limited (PGS) and Steven D Kalavity dated 5 December 2013 (the “Settlement Contract”), PGS agreed not publish or cause to be published any statement (whether of fact or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Employee.
Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.7:
9.7 In consideration for the obligations entered into by the Employee in this Clause 9, the Company agrees to make reasonable efforts:
Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7
(a) neither to make nor publish, nor cause to be made or published, to anyone in any circumstances any statement (whether of fact or opinion) which directly or indirectly disparages, is harmful to or damages the reputation or standing of the Employee (save as may be required by law or regulation), nor to represent the Employee as an authorized agent/employee or otherwise of the Company once his employment has ended, and
Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7(a)
(b) to keep the existence and terms of this Agreement and the circumstances giving rise to its making confidential and not to disclose, communicate or otherwise make public these terms to any third party save and except as required by law or regulation, or in confidence to its professional advisers.
Settlement Agreement Confidentiality Clause 9.7(B)
PGS has also breached the Settlement Contract Confidentiality clause 9.6 through misrepresenting protected public disclosure as criminal defamation in Thailand. PGS has not followed policy or whistleblower procedures. PGS has illegally retaliated against a whistleblower through these intentional breaches.


Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.6:
9.6 Nothing in this Clause 9 shall prevent the Employee from disclosing information which he is entitled to disclose under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998, provided that the disclosure is made in accordance with the provisions of that Act and the Employee has complied with the Company’s policy from time to time regarding such disclosure.
Settlement Contract Confidentiality Clause 9.6



The Settlement Contract was referenced to be legally affirmed and valid by PGS within the 16 July 2018 response to the SDK submitted subject access request (2018 SAR Response).
Thai Criminal case number 2551/2561 claim document (“PGS Thai Claim”) was signed and dated by PGS directors: Rune Olav Pedersen, Gottfred Langseth, and Christin Steen-Nilsen 10 July 2018. PGS directors also affirmed the Settlement Contract.
Therefore, the PGS Thai Claim constitutes a material breach of the Settlement Contract by PGS. The PGS Thai Claim is not a valid legal instrument.
SDK is demanding the withdrawal of all claims and contracts that are a derivative of PGS ASA breaching the Settlement Contract.
Regards,
SDK




###
EXPLAIN THE 25 OCTOBER 2013 MEMO PGS ASA: [email protected], [email protected] DUENSING – KIPPEN (OLAF DUENSING and TIPPAYA MOONMANEE) WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS: [email protected],
PGS ASA: [email protected],
gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
John Francas / PGS ASA have never cited a breach in the Confidentiality clauses of SDK – PGS Exploration (UK) Limited contracts (2010 & 2013) prohibiting disparaging parties. However, SDK cites several PGS ASA breaches in these agreements!


John Francas, PGS UK Head of Legal, Ignorance and the Fraud of Omission (4 October 2019)
What’s wrong with English contracts governed by the laws of England, PGS?

(b)Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of value, so deposits, or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of the addressee or of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
NORWAY’S PGS ASA EXPORTS CORRUPTION and BRIBES DUENSING – KIPPEN in THAILAND because PGS ASA has NO Evidence of DEFAMATION in UK

gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
USA FEDERAL LAW VIOLATIONS – RACKETEERING INFLUENCED and CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO)

Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
DON’T LET NORWAY’S PGS ASA EXPORT CORRUPTION to THAILAND




gareth.jones@pgs.com, [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
PGS ASA and Duensing – Kippen Broke USA Federal Law and Illegally Copied SDK Passport to Stalk and Harass SDK and form an ILLEGAL FALSE CLAIM. PGS ASA want SDK to STOP Legally Protected WHISTLEBLOWING. PGS ASA wants SDK to Destroy Evidence of PGS ASA CRIMES!
